About Us

What is
a Co-op?

Starting
a Co-op

Events

Publications

Co-op News

Links

Contact Us

 




WWW RCC
       


 

Impact of China’s Economic Growth On California’s Agricultural Cooperatives & Producers

Summary of Findings from Workshop
sponsored by UC Davis Rural Cooperatives Center
July 13, 2006
Sacramento

compiled by Shermain Hardesty, Director, UC Davis Rural Cooperatives Center
- Powerpoint presentations available for download as pdf files, where applicable.

 

 



 

 


Workshop Presenters:

Colin Carter, Professor, Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of California, Davis
Fred Gale, Economist, Economic Research Service, USDA
Shermain Hardesty, Extension Economist & Director, Rural Cooperatives Center, University of California, Davis
Richard Howitt, Professor & Chair, Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of California, Davis
Scott Rozelle, Professor, Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of California, Davis
Michael Wootton, Vice President for Corporate Relations, Sunkist Growers

 

China’s Rising Bamboo Curtain (Shermain Hardesty)

  • Major reforms began about 25 years ago
  • China foreign trade was merely $20.6 billion then; in 2003, totaled $851.2 billion.
  • 25 years ago, more than 250 million people were living below the poverty line. By 2003, the figure was reduced to less than 30 million
  • Chinese government has made development its top priority


China’s Economy (Shermain Hardesty, Fred Gale)


China’s Trade Issues (Fred Gale, Colin Carter)

  • China is #4 market for US ag exports
  • Soybeans & cotton comprise 2/3 of US exports to China
  • China’s rising fruit & vegetable exports challenge California’s cooperatives and producers
  • Private companies from Japan, US and other countries have made significant investments in specific agricultural sectors in China
  • Importing nations use nontariff trade barriers to restrict imports from emerging exporters like China
  • US’ Antidumping orders disrupt imports from China for only 3 to 4 years


China’s Efforts with Genetically Modified Crops (Scott Rozelle)

  • Chinese government. has invested considerably in biotech
  • If China commercializes GM rice, GM rice will be planted on 50% of rice acreage within 5 years
  • Even if faced with trade barriers on GM rice, expect $5 billion in economic benefits to producers & consumers from GM rice
  • Currently, there is much counterfeit GM seed due to poor intellectual property rights system
  • GM crops, such as rice and Bt cotton, increase China’s production efficiency and improve farmer health through reduced pesticide usage
  • South Korea and Japan are likely to prohibit imports of Chinese rice if China commercializes GM rice

    See also:
  • Insect-Resistant GM Rice in Farmers Fields: Assessing Productivity and Health Effects in China
  • Plant Biotechnology in China


Water Availability in China (Richard Howitt)

  • Water shortages will push China’s farmers to grow a higher proportion of high value crops—competing with some of California’s specialty crops
  • China will need to import staple crops


China’s Demand for Processed Foods (Fred Gale)

  • China’s consumers are demanding greater food choices
  • China is expanding its array of food choices
  • Retail outlets
  • Restaurant chains
  • Branded foods
  • Best US/California export opportunities to China appear to be:
    - Food with health benefits
    - Banquet or gift foods
    - Exotic or new foods
    - Trendy foods
  • “Safe” foods (no pesticide residues/meeting high food safety standards)


Sunkist’s Experiences In China (Michael Wootton)

  • Sunkist is targeting consumers in upper 5% income bracket in Eastern China
  • Sunkist has 90% brand awareness and is subject to counterfeiting
  • Retailers don’t buy direct from Sunkist
  • Importers often have cash flow constraints
  • China is expanding its citrus plantings, facing strong domestic & export markets


Conclusions

  • Comparative advantages will determine how China impacts producers of certain crops in California
  • China has much cheaper labor
  • China has lower tariffs & lower transportation costs than US in Asian markets
  • California has more efficient land holding structure
  • California has more stringent environmental controls impacting food safety and regulations governing food quality
  • California’s food technology and distribution systems are considerably more highly developed
  • Does it make sense for California’s ag cooperatives to collaborate with firms/producers in some of China’s agricultural sectors?
 
 
 
 
 

 


Rural Cooperatives Center, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics
One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, California 95616 USA
Tel: (530) 752-2408 Fax. (530) 752-5451 Email: ruralcoops@ucdavis.edu